Dimitri's Letters · Issue 13

The Pay Gap Nobody Names

Every academic surgeon I know has, at some point, done the private practice math in their head and then quietly closed that tab. Today I want to actually open it, because the real numbers are more specific, and more revealing, than the vague sense most of us carry around.

73% vs 15%

The increase in inflation adjusted collections per work RVU for academic versus non academic surgeons from 2010 to 2022, in MGMA survey data. Per unit of surgical work, academic practices captured value at nearly five times the growth rate.

Read that again slowly, because it is not the number you would expect. Academic surgery is often assumed to be the slower, more protected lane, with clinical volume traded off against teaching and research time. The data says otherwise. Academic surgeons generated 12 to 23 percent more work RVUs than non academic surgeons in every year studied, and by 2022 their practices collected 7 percent more per RVU.

Now here is the part that should actually bother you.

Total compensation for academic surgeons did not rise to match that surge in collections. The ratio of what they were paid to what they collected was 0.99 in 2010 and 0.99 in 2022, essentially flat. The hospital captured the upside. The surgeon did not.

The mechanical reason is almost administrative in its dullness, which is exactly why nobody talks about it. Only an estimated 30 to 40 percent of academic departments use academic RVU incentive plans, which reward research, teaching, and administrative work, and academic surgeon salaries tend to be fixed. You can produce more and your paycheck may not notice.

What the math actually looks like

10%
Less total cash compensation for academic surgeons than for non academic surgeons in 2022, down from 21 percent less in 2010. By subspecialty the gap ranged from about 3 percent in colorectal surgery to 26 percent in plastic surgery.
10 to 16%
Less pay per work RVU for academic surgeons than for non academic surgeons in every year studied, even though academic surgeons generated more RVUs.
85%
Career satisfaction among academic surgeons in a 2018 survey of American College of Surgeons fellows, against 78 percent of their private practice peers, despite the pay gap. Academic surgeons were also more satisfied with their pay, 59 versus 39 percent. These are the numbers that make the whole picture more complicated than a simple story of being underpaid.

So the honest picture is not that academic surgery is a bad deal. It is that academic surgery is a specific, deliberate trade, and most surgeons never see the terms of that trade written down plainly enough to decide with open eyes whether they are making it on purpose or simply by inertia.

You are trading a meaningful percentage of lifetime earnings, often into the hundreds of thousands of dollars over a career, for protected time, teaching, research infrastructure, and a form of professional satisfaction that shows up in the survey data. That can be a genuinely good trade. It should not be an accidental one.

If you are deciding, or reconsidering

  1. Ask your department directly whether an RVU incentive structure exists, and if not, why not. Most surgeons never ask. Departments that have never been asked rarely volunteer to change the structure on their own.
  2. Get a real private practice comparison for your specialty and region, not a national average. The gap in total pay moves significantly by subspecialty, from about 3 to 26 percent. Know your actual number before you weigh the trade.
  3. Name what you are actually buying with the gap, specifically. Protected research time, a title track, a specific mentor, a training program. If you cannot name it specifically, the trade is running on inertia rather than a decision.

If you are a resident or fellow trying to decide between paths, or an attending wondering whether your current structure still makes sense, this is a conversation worth having deliberately rather than by default. AskDimitri can help you think through what you are actually optimizing for.

Think through the trade →

Nobody chooses academic surgery for the money. That is fine, and often admirable. What is not fine is not knowing the actual size of what you are giving up, because a trade you cannot name is a trade you cannot defend, to yourself or to anyone else.

Editor's note: in October 2026 the figures in this letter were checked against the sources listed below, and the text was corrected where the letter as sent differed from them.

Until next week,

Dimitri

Dr. Dimitrios Magouliotis · Research Associate Professor, cardiac surgery research · About the author

Sources

  1. Grimsley EA, Anderson DO, Kendall MA, Zander T, Parikh R, Weigel RJ, Kuo PC. For the love of the game: calculating the premium associated with academic surgical practice. Ann Surg. 2024;280(4):640-649. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006414. PMID: 38916098.
  2. Parikh RS, Grimsley EA, Anderson DO, Kendall MA, Zander T, Wolansky R, Sujka J, Kuo PC. The passion tax: valuation disparity among academic and nonacademic surgery subspecialty. J Am Coll Surg. 2025;240(4):378-388. doi:10.1097/XCS.0000000000001304. PMID: 40029934.
  3. Mahoney ST, Irish W, Strassle PD, Schroen AT, Freischlag JA, Tuttle-Newhall JEB, Brownstein MR. Practice characteristics and job satisfaction of private practice and academic surgeons. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(3):247-254. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5670. PMID: 33326032.
  4. Baimas-George M, Fleischer B, Korndorffer JR, Slakey D, DuCoin C. The economics of private practice versus academia in surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(5):1276-1280. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.006. PMID: 29674107.

A new letter goes out every week, to subscribers first. Join to get the next one.

Get the letters, and access to the assistant

How your data is handled

What you share with the assistant is not stored by AskDimitri, unless you choose to save conversations on your account. It goes to Anthropic, our AI provider, only to generate the answer. Anthropic deletes it within 30 days (longer only if it is flagged for a safety review) and does not train on it.